|
Background
Before any
GM crops can be sown, or food produced from GM crops can be sold,
they must go through a rigorous approval process, involving several
expert committees.
The main
committees responsible for food safety aspects of GM crops in
the UK are:
-
The Advisory
Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP)
-
The committee
on Toxicity of Chemicals in Foods, Consumer Products and the Environment
(COT)
-
The Food
Advisory Committee (FAC)
These food
safety bodies are now controlled by the Food Standards Agency
(FSA).
Transparency
In order to
ensure transparency and accountability, the proceedings of all
of these committees are available to the public, and they also
hold public meetings.
What tests
are done?
The food safety
assessment carried out by the ACNFP requires biotechnology companies
like Monsanto to submit genetically modified crops for extensive
independent studies. These include:
-
"Mechanism
of Action" test: A study to understand precisely what the added
protein that has been inserted into the plant is intended to
do. This is critical as it shows whether the protein added will
cause any harmful effects (such as the production of toxic chemicals)
-
A digestibility
study - to establish, for example, how quickly the added protein
is broken down inside the gut (in the case of GM soya, for example,
this is around 60 seconds)
-
A study
to screen for known allergens and toxins (called "Bioinformatics
Screening")
-
An acute
oral toxicity study - comprising a two week toxicology study
in which the additional protein is fed in its pure form to mice,
at a rate at least 1000 times higher than a humans would ever
be exposed to.
-
Nutritional
(wholesomeness) animal feeding studies - to establish that the
new variety, for example GM soya, is equivalent in its composition,
nutrition and functionality as non-GM soya.
-
Non-target
animal studies - for pesticidal proteins only. (These studies
involve extensive ecotoxicological evaluations based on testing
both pure protein and/or the GM plant for toxic effects and
desirable insects and/or animals that are important in the eco-system)
Where the
above studies reveal that there are unique or unresolved issues
concerning the added protein, the regulatory authorities can demand
that further studies are carried out. These can include:
-
Sub-chronic
animal feeding studies - comprising medium-term feeding studies
in animals, including chickens, ruminants and mono-gastrics
-
Case-specific
in vitro (ie. outside a living organism) toxicology studies
-
Further
studies of the "Mechanism of Action" of the protein
-
In vivo
(ie. inside a living organism) protein fate studies
-
Human
clinical trials (eg. food allergy evaluations) - though these
tests are rarely required because of the extensive evidence
which results from the other tests
More information
about Genetic
Engineering and The Allergy Issue.
|