Monsanto UKSunday, 17th April, 2005 |
Backgrounder on the Safety Assessment and Regulatory Status of MON 863 YieldGard® Rootworm MaizeBackground: The rootworm issue What is MON 863 YieldGard® Rootworm maize? The use of biological insect control is more environmentally sustainable than the use of pesticides. Bt proteins have been used for pest control for more than 40 years by farmers worldwide, including organic farmers. MON863 YieldGard® Rootworm has been grown commercially in the United States and Canada since 2003, and has been approved for import and food use in many countries around the world, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Russia and Mexico. Details on MON 863 maize can be found at http://www.essentialbiosafety.info/main.php. Regulatory status of MON 863 maize in the EU Regulatory approval for the import and use of biotech crops in the EU requires a number of steps involving review by more than one hundred independent scientists acting on behalf of the European Commission and Member States' governments. The regulatory steps that MON 863 has undergone in the EU are described below. In July 2002, Monsanto submitted an application for import of MON 863 maize (excluding cultivation) under Directive 90/220/EEC to Germany, the country acting as Rapporteur for this file. This submission, which contained the Rat 90-day Subchronic Dietary Feeding Study conducted by a third party (1), was then updated to fulfill the new 2001/18/EC requirements. Germany issued a positive Initial Assessment Report (2), which was forwarded to the EU Member States for review in April 2003. In parallel, the application was opened for public review and comment on 05 May 2003. Monsanto submitted an application under the novel food and novel food ingredients Regulation (EC) N° 258/97, also to Germany as lead Member State, in July 2002. Germany issued an Initial Assessment Report, which was forwarded to the EU Member States for review in June 2003. Answers to additional questions, comments and reasoned objections from some Member States were submitted to all Member States in September 2003. In order to provide further independent assessment, Monsanto commissioned a formal Study and Pathology, Peer review (7). This was a voluntary activity on behalf of Monsanto in which two highly experienced independent veterinary pathologists, one having particular expertise in relation to renal histopathology, conducted a Peer Review of this study to arrive at a scientific consensus on whether there were any toxicologically significant findings in this study. After detailed review and discussion, the experts concluded, consistent with the original report, "that dietary administration of MON 863 corn did not induce toxic effects in the kidneys of rats". The European Foods Standards Authority (EFSA) evaluated the complete dossier and adopted a positive scientific opinion on 02 April 2004, concluding, "the placing on the market of MON 863 is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed use." (http://www.efsa.eu.int/) (3). Regulators at some Member States raised questions about the studies submitted as part of Monsanto's applications, and this is a normal part of the regulatory process. Monsanto has addressed these questions and performed additional scientific analysis as necessary. As a result, European competent authorities now concur that MON 863 YieldGard Rootworm maize is as safe as conventional maize for human and animal health and the environment. The next stage in the process is a vote on MON 863 by EU Member States.
References (1) 13 week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1 - Week Baseline Food Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002. (OECD Protocol 408) Covance Study No. 6l03-293, issued 17th December 2002 (2) Assessment Report of the Robert Koch Institut in Accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC, Insect -Resistant Maize MON 863 and MON 863 x MON 810, 8th April 2003 (draft translation); http://gmoinfo.jrc.it/gmc_browse.asp Assessment Report PDF file (3) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safety of foods and food ingredients derived from insect-protected genetically modified maize MON 863 and MON 863 x MON 810, for which a request for placing on the market was submitted under Article 4 of the Novel Food Regulation (EC) No 258/97 by Monsanto (Question No EFSA - Q - 2003 - 121) Opinion Adopted on 2nd April 2004 (3a) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Notification (Reference C/DE/02/9) for the placing on the market of insect-protected genetically modified maize MON 863 and MON 863 x MON 810, for import and processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Monsanto (Question No EFSA-Q-2003-089) Opinion Adopted on 2nd April 2004 (4) AFSSA (French Food Safety Agency) Opinion dated 2nd December 2003 http://www.afssa.fr/Object.asp?IdObj=-4&Pge=0&search=MON%20863&cwSID=E95C8119B0E544B8A64296D770CA52B5&AID=0 (5) CGB (Commission du Genie Biomoleculaire) Opinion dated 28th October 2003 … http://ogm.agriculture.gouv.fr/mise_marche/avis_scientifiques/avis_scientifique_2003.htm (6) Supplemental Analysis of Selected Findings on the Rat 90-day Feeding Study with MON 863 Maize, Report MSL - 18175; Hammond, B.G. and Ward, D.P., Monsanto Co., USA, 24th May 2004 (7) Retrospective Evaluation of Renal Tissues and data from Monsanto Co. Study CV - 2000 - 260 (MSL 18175): a 13 week Rat Feeding Study with MON 863 Corn, (Covance Laboratories Study No 6103-293) Click here to read the MON 863 Maize 90-Day Rat Feeding Study Design and Conduct Fact Sheet.
Copyright 2005 Monsanto UK All Rights Reserved |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Monsanto in the UK | Biotech Primer | Knowledge Centre | Discussion Monsanto Elsewhere | Links | Comments & Questions | Home | News Copyright 2010 Monsanto Company |
||||||||||||||||||||