Sussex UniversityMonday, 12 July 1999By Professor Michael Lipton |
Genetically Modified Crops Already Diminishing Undernutrition
Yes, GM foods need long-term health monitoring, though they have been
grown commercially in the US since 1994, and on well over 1m hectares in
China, with no reported health damage. The Nuffield report suggests that new
aid should help developing countries to design and implement appropriate,
open procedures to regulate, improve and monitor the health and
environmental impact of specific GM varieties. However, as the World Health
Organisation and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation agree, a huge
source of health damage is undernutrition and underemployment due to risky
and unproductive varieties of staple food crops. Hence caution demands not
only regulation and monitoring but also a big increase in the present dismally
low share of GM research that tests or spreads improved varieties of food
staples.
Finally, Dr Bhargava stated that my arguing for GM foods as a weapon against
undernutrition "would even seem disingenuous to those who see it as a
conspiracy to experiment with dangerous products on the most vulnerable".
"Those who see it" that way are making groundless charges of
disingenuousness and callousness. I see no ethical grounds for denying
Vitamin A-enhanced GM rice to children at risk of eye damage but I accept
the good faith of those who do. "Those who" unreasonably attack others' good
faith, especially if also failing to address the substance of a controversy,
merely demonstrate the weakness of their own case.
|
|
Monsanto in the UK | Biotech Primer | Knowledge Centre | Discussion Copyright Monsanto Company |
||