Scientist
Defends Safety Of GM Foods
Scientists
last night moved to reassure the public that genetically modified foods
are safe after claims that the American government had carried out a
massive cover-up and ignored scientific advice.
An American lawyer used yesterday's GM food safety conference of the
OECD in Edinburgh to highlight his attempt to make the US Government
clear the shelves of GM food, claiming it had not reached legal safety
standards.
But last night the American Food and Drug Administration's [FDA] senior
delegate at the conference said GM foods were as safe as other foods
in supermarkets, and were subject to rigorous testing.
Dr James Maryanski of the FDA told the conference that new foods on
the market were tested to make sure they were as safe as traditional
foods.
American attorney Steven Druker said the FDA had ignored scientific
advice from its own experts that there were concerns over the safety
of GM foods.
Mr Druker said the FDA had illegally allowed GM food to be licensed
wholesale in the US by bypassing its own standards of safety - and it
had therefore been allowed into British markets without proper safety
checks.
Dr Maryanski defended the FDA against the claims and said it was contesting
the lawsuit vigorously.
He said: "In public meetings, we heard nothing to question the
safety of food on sale."
His claims were backed by Peter Kearns of the OECD's health and safety
department, who said: "The vast majority of OECD member countries
have a system in place to assess the safety of these products, and I
believe that system is working."
Greenpeace delegates had earlier launched a strong attack on genetically
modified foods, saying the same assertions of safety were being made
as had been for nuclear power 40 years ago.
Benedikt Haerlin of Greenpeace International said: "Billions have
now been spent and even more billions will have to be spent in order
to control the problems which have arisen from the introduction of nuclear
energy.
"We are concerned the same problems are being created with genetic
modification."
Earlier, conference organisers had been accused of being subtly biased
towards the pro-GM agenda.
But an OECD spokesman rejected the claim by the Soil Association and
said the £400,000 three-day conference featured delegates from
both ends of the GM spectrum.
The same point was emphasised by Cabinet Office Minister Mo Mowlam when
she opened the conference.
Copyright 2000 The
Journal All Rights Reserved
|